"S" and "sh" problem

Share your technical insight with beginners in this area, or pick up techniques and tricks-of-the-trade posted by seasoned Orion users.

Moderators: Christophe, Mark

"S" and "sh" problem

Postby Rzarek » Sat Feb 27, 2010 12:55 pm

Hello!

I am preparing a short commercial soundtrack which consists of my song made in Orion and some speech recorded with a wireless microphone while shooting. So far I have prepared a few such tracks, but for the first time I have to deal with a non-reader's, no studio quality talking. I've spent a lot of time to clean up the actress voice in Audacity so I it almost ready to be mixed (in OP). Unfortunately the actress has some kind of speech impediment which is especially gross after using compressor. Her "s" and "sh" are terribly prominent. I've heard of de-essers, even downloaded VST one, but it does not seem to work or (more probable) I don't know how to use it correctly. Could you please give me some advice?
Rzarek
Novice
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 10:16 am
Location: Kraków, Polska

"S" and "sh" problem

Postby Icaro » Sat Feb 27, 2010 3:04 pm

YES..... shoot the vocalist!
Icaro
Professional
 
Posts: 1101
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 10:04 am
Location: Hungary

"S" and "sh" problem

Postby Dungeon Studio » Sat Feb 27, 2010 5:52 pm

Hate to say Razarek, you might have to go in and manually clamp down the s's with a fade - either in or out. IE; the sentence is 'Stop selling snakes', you'd carefully fade in the portion of the first three words and carefully fade out the last as welll. Complete PITA I agree. But, on close up views the s's are fairly evident as spikey noise clusters. So just highlighting those areas and executing fade in/out's should improve the track greatly.

As long as you don't have to work with this chick!
Last edited by Dungeon Studio on Sat Feb 27, 2010 5:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Dungeon Studio
Godlike
 
Posts: 4908
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 6:29 pm

"S" and "sh" problem

Postby V/M » Sat Feb 27, 2010 6:50 pm

consider if you REALLY need the compressor
V/M
Professional
 
Posts: 1486
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 9:20 am
Location: NC, USA

"S" and "sh" problem

Postby Icaro » Sat Feb 27, 2010 10:28 pm

it's a hungarian thing. A lot of my students have that exact same problem. Another big one is with the 'v' and the 'w'
Last edited by Icaro on Sat Feb 27, 2010 10:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Icaro
Professional
 
Posts: 1101
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 10:04 am
Location: Hungary

"S" and "sh" problem

Postby Dungeon Studio » Sat Feb 27, 2010 10:41 pm

I find S's easier to fix than booming P's and T's (and sometimes K's)
Never heard of V's or W's before? How could they be more problematic in Hungarian over English pronounciations? Unless it's the placement and phonetics after? Like Prizzi in Itallian, the two z's make it prounced 'Prit-say'. But would never want to hear Giovanni say 'Prizzi has a itsy-bitsy of the frizzies today. Get a some hair spray. eh?'
Last edited by Dungeon Studio on Sat Feb 27, 2010 10:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Dungeon Studio
Godlike
 
Posts: 4908
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 6:29 pm

"S" and "sh" problem

Postby Icaro » Sat Feb 27, 2010 10:56 pm

hehehehe..... I was just being funny.... but in case you're really interested.... the is no diffrence between the 'v' and 'w' in hungarian. so, when going over web etiquette I usually hear veeveevee.something.com

kind of charming actually
Icaro
Professional
 
Posts: 1101
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 10:04 am
Location: Hungary

"S" and "sh" problem

Postby Icaro » Sat Feb 27, 2010 10:59 pm

maybe Lance could tell you something about it. ;)

another one is the 'th' as in thursday. It's really hard for them....... but there are several sounds in hungarian that are a total bitch for me to pronounce.
Icaro
Professional
 
Posts: 1101
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 10:04 am
Location: Hungary

"S" and "sh" problem

Postby Dungeon Studio » Sun Feb 28, 2010 2:04 am

You leg puller you! :rofl: The ones I really have to watch how people say are 'statistics' and amazingly the word 'serious'. I'm not sure if it's South Park that started it with Al Gore and his Man-Pig alerts - 'I'm being serial here people! Really serial!' But it's seem to have crept into daily speech somehow. Even for people who've never seen South Park at all. I'll say something like 'Bin Laden apparently made another tape again?' and they reply 'Are you serial...I mean serious?' And my jaw just drops. Okay if you're a South Park fan doing a Al Gore impersenation... Otherwise, it really sounds retarded and ignorant.

The worst sentence ever to be spoken and recorded...
"Cher stops speaking seriously about statistic's and propigates pandamonium for Wolf Blitzer and Larry King' - Anyone that can complete and record that successfully without screens or comp's should be be given an Achievement Award. :superlol:
Last edited by Dungeon Studio on Sun Feb 28, 2010 2:05 am, edited 1 time in total.
Dungeon Studio
Godlike
 
Posts: 4908
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 6:29 pm

"S" and "sh" problem

Postby Eklectro » Sun Feb 28, 2010 1:50 pm

use some editor or zoom in a lot and applys volume change in a first time.
a de esser will work for an entire song or for live perf.
Orion 8, Live 8Le, Cubase 4 LE, Cantana, APC40, UC16, Fostex PM1MKII, Q9550, 4G0, 1,5T, 22"+15"

http://soundcloud.com/eklectro/i-like-xylo-29-03-2011
Eklectro
Apprentice
 
Posts: 626
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 10:39 pm

"S" and "sh" problem

Postby epilogue » Mon Mar 01, 2010 5:36 pm

Being that I'm too lazy to ready to see if someone else suggested this, I'll just spout it.

Use a compressor/PEQ on the BandFX container (with the PEQ/Compressor on the trouble range). It'd also help to find where the spikes' frequencies lie by using something like Voxengo Span or similar plugin to visualize the sound.
Phreque.com - Weapons-Grade Awesome.
User avatar
epilogue
Elite Producer
 
Posts: 1587
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2004 7:41 am
Location: Austin, TX (USA)

"S" and "sh" problem

Postby Kriminal » Mon Mar 01, 2010 6:07 pm

Windows 11 Home - 12th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-12400 2.50 GHz -32GB RAM
250GB SSD - 1TB HDD | M-Audio Oxygen 25 V
Kriminal
Immortal
 
Posts: 7614
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2004 12:13 am

"S" and "sh" problem

Postby ufo » Mon Mar 01, 2010 9:20 pm

I love that blockfish. I often use the gentle bus setting and the saturation is really nice.
---=u f o=--- /Radiation Mutant / Snee-Nee-Iq
ufo
Elite Producer
 
Posts: 1671
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2004 12:11 pm
Location: Mt Dandenong Australia

"S" and "sh" problem

Postby Icaro » Tue Mar 02, 2010 11:44 am

has anyone had much luck with the spitfish? For me, it makes things sound muddy, as if the plug-in should be called mudpuppy instead of spitfish.

The other plug-ins work great for me. :)
Icaro
Professional
 
Posts: 1101
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 10:04 am
Location: Hungary

"S" and "sh" problem

Postby Rzarek » Tue Mar 02, 2010 1:58 pm

Hi!

Thanks a lot for your advice! Finally I managed to prepare an acceptable version (at least acceptable for me, as my client is... incredibly demanding... never met anyone like this one before!).

First of all, using Audacity, I precisely faded all that damn "s", "sh" and palatal s "¶" (as you see, we've got quite a lot of sybillants in Polish). That was kind of useful due to another reason - after zooming I spotted some more artifacts which emerged after denoising.

Then, as V/M suggested, I considered using compressor. Without it, the voice seemed rather dull. But apart from the sybillants, there were too many defects in the recording (eg. some denoising jitter) which got exposed after compressing. So I decided not to use compressor as it brings more harm than profit in this case. By the way, on Sunday I found Paul White's "Recording and Production Techniques" in the bookstore. The chapters about Vocals and Dynamics Control were really useful to understand my problem.

I decided to do some kind of compression manually, creating a precise amplitude envelope in Audacity. Well, it's not what actual compressor does, but the track souded better.

I put that clean voice track into OP and added rendered song on the second channel.

Next i tried that Spitfish on the voice track. Very easy to use and effective, I have to admit. Well, probably my ear is not trained enough to hear its muddiness, it seems quite OK for me.

The track started to sound decently, but I decided to do some EQ treatments. I used spectrum analyser and noticed that "s", "sh" and "¶" appear in different ranges, so I delicately lowered their gains with PEQ.

Finally I tried "ducking" technique of which I read in White's book - I put compressor on the song and sidechained it to the voice track. Then I used an exciter on master bus.

Well, probably these are some complete basics of audio editing, but I am really happy I've learnt something;).
Last edited by Rzarek on Thu Mar 18, 2010 5:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Rzarek
Novice
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 10:16 am
Location: Kraków, Polska

Next

Return to Tips'n'tricks

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 417 guests

© 2017 Synapse Audio Software. All Rights Reserved.