Mark wrote:
Drop the sarcasm please.
There's plenty of support for your idea, both in this thread and the many others that have gone before. Ultimately, it's up to the developer whether or not this gets implemented and the good news is that user feedback does often get implemented.
So why hasn't it been implemented yet? Two possibilities: a) the developer thinks it's a useless idea; b) it isn't easy to implement in the current structure. I think it's probably mostly the latter. Maybe if you spent a bit of time thinking about what the implementation would involve then you'd realise it would be a lot more than a line of code.
Personally, I think it would be a good idea, although I would rarely find a use for it.
Thanks for your reply and sorry for the sarcasm. It's easy to go into defense mode with sarcasm as a shield when you're assumed to be a total idiot/newbie. Ill try to better myself and not read forums until after the morning coffee has settled
About the two possibilities - I would LOVE to hear from the developer. Having the names intact during export would probably involve much less coding. Im trying to think of ways around this issue. Maybe an effect you could insert after the synth and sample directly. Automatic sampling of all patterns would of course be preferred but one at a time would be ok - as long as it's in sync! I own Ni's Maschine which also has an FX version .. but, i wont be able to use it's output in the mixer. Naturally i could use the effects in Maschine instead but then what's the use of having Orion
Not having orion's lfo tool is no fun!
And guys.. seriously, give diva a spin..
Nevermind the lower part and just focus on the modules. Pick the ones from jupiter8 or maybe alpha juno .. or minimoog ... or ms20..
The sound is fantastic!!