The Legend HZ feature improvements

[themachinelt]

Hi,

I upgraded The Legend to HZ version and i love it tho i do find couple areas could be improved:

Unison could be made to play in poly. Unison is using 4 stacks of voices, why not to utilize all 12 voices and give 3 note poly in Unison?

[Kriminal]

That is not how unison works

Unison has Always been monophonic

[themachinelt]

That is not how unison works

Unison has Always been monophonic

Kriminal again ... Analog Minimoog didnt had 6 oscillators and unison at all, whats your point?

This is a VA, not analog synth, i dont see why there is a problem to implament it. Diva for instance has this ability. Roland themselves implamented on Junos that didnt had unison.

[springreverb]

That is not how unison works

Unison has Always been monophonic

-
Other synths have shared unison actually and it makes perfect sense to have it

[springreverb]

I was surprised there is no Oscillator sync?!
That's in the top 3 minimoog mods, any plans to implement it, other emulations don't have it either, missed a trick there, plus it would be a really great addition.
Thanks for listening.

[Kisame]

Yes, poly unison is one of my favorite features in a synth, and I feel like it's especially powerful on synths that's modelling analog characteristics, in those it gets even better results out of poly unison, than a strictly wavetable based synths out there (which more often have the feature, than their analog/subtractive synthesis emulating counterparts.. maybe due to CPU reasons, but we have more powerful CPUs now, can't the code run in multi-core?)

Ideally, I'd like to see the return of note priority: low . I'd like legendhz to be a "bass arpeggiator", so it's getting fed a chord, and it will arpeggiate only the bass note or lowest note. I could do something like this with previous legend, but it didn't have built-in arp, so it had to run through messy external arp plugin (messy in ableton, that is). I haven't found a way to do this in current version of LegendHZ (arpeggiate only bass/lowest notes)

I don't know how complicated it would become, but maybe being able to reorder the FX modules? Like draggin them around to different position create different chain

And I hope it doesn't go too far, but if it's possible, maybe increase max voice from 12 to 16? If there ever going to be poly unison, more voice will help

[Uwe Johannsen]

a pan control (pre-effect section) would be nice.

[Atom]

With so many more parameters now, being able to lock sections would be far more user friendly than having to lock every setting individually. Lock all could save a ton of time when you only want certain parameters to change, rather than have certain parameters stay the same.

Needing a drop-down menu each time for MSEG/Seq is also clunky. Prev/next buttons, keyboard, and/or mouse wheel support would be an improvement. As well as presets for the FX.


And seeing as this is 6 osc and every preset for the original version is 3 osc, it would be nice to have a better way to combine them, like loading one into 1-3, and another into 4-6.

If the oscillator rows could be swapped, users could load a preset from the normal version, swap osc 1-3 to 4-6, lock them, then load a 2nd v1 preset using the now empty slots 1-3.

[Marsi 27]

It would also be very desirable to display the MSEG envelope values ​​for the X and Y axes in order to be able to adjust them better.
It would also be great to manually enter the values ​​of the MSEG point to be edited.
This also applies to DUNE 3, or the Obsession Y values ​​of the two step LFOs.

[joshuahj33]

How about more options in effect configuration? Moving modulaions around could create some nice effects.