Wasp fat mode for both oscillatorsModerators: Christophe, Mark
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Wasp fat mode for both oscillatorsI know this would be more cpu agressive, but I think it deserves it.
Wasp fat mode for both oscillatorsWasp actually has three oscillators. i think making it a global thing would be simplest.
Dell G7 (Hexa-Core i7)|Cubase Pro 10||Analog Keys|Ultranova|MicroMonsta|Uno|Skulpt|Craft Synth 2.0|
novakill.com
Wasp fat mode for both oscillatorsYes, that was I want mean. Global fat mode.
Wasp fat mode for both oscillatorsThis is when everyone in the world eats McDonald's for every meal, right? Sorry, just a funny image that came to mind. - Global Fat Mode, do want fries with that?
wouldn't be a bad idea though..... I mean for the wasp.
Wasp fat mode for both oscillators
+1 for that, global is def the best way. Windows 11 Home - 12th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-12400 2.50 GHz -32GB RAM
250GB SSD - 1TB HDD | M-Audio Oxygen 25 V
Wasp fat mode for both oscillators+1, but the sub oscillator should be leaved out of the fat mode. And the second oscillator's fat mode should be independent from the first. That way the sound possibilities would be more diverse.
Global fat mode would be only a global unison, which would give us less diverse sound capabilities compared to independent fat modes of the two main oscillators.
Wasp fat mode for both oscillatorsyes or 3 separate I know its 2 more knobs but it probably will give the wasp way more power.
Did You Know you can download my albums on 1albums.com and you can promote your own there to
http://www.myspace.com/djmatthy
Wasp fat mode for both oscillators... and will require more power from your CPU
SoundCloud ::: Facebook
Wasp fat mode for both oscillators
on of function? Did You Know you can download my albums on 1albums.com and you can promote your own there to
http://www.myspace.com/djmatthy
Wasp fat mode for both oscillatorsnot necessarily, but depends on what PHAT does mathematically on int or floats. ld: two things can happen. processing time 1. remains constant 2. will increase that will conclude today's lecture.
Wasp fat mode for both oscillators
it's actually the sub-osc where I think it would work best as an independent parameter. you could thicken things up really well without the obvious unison sound coming through. Dell G7 (Hexa-Core i7)|Cubase Pro 10||Analog Keys|Ultranova|MicroMonsta|Uno|Skulpt|Craft Synth 2.0|
novakill.com
Wasp fat mode for both oscillators
I really don't understand what you meant by that. I was adding to your previous post that refers to giving "wasp way more power"
True, two things can happen, but I was referring to matthy's suggestion of inserting the additional knob or two for each oscillator. The initial CPU consumption, when compared to what it draws now (presuming other parameters are the same, ie. same preset), will increase. Adding to that possible changes of the sound, ie. cutoff filter or LFO applied to various things... I think it will increase even more. Of course, I'm not a coder/programmer, hence all this is just MHO SoundCloud ::: Facebook
Wasp fat mode for both oscillatorsno sorry with power i meant more possibilities
and with an on off function you could bypass the fat to save the cpu Did You Know you can download my albums on 1albums.com and you can promote your own there to
http://www.myspace.com/djmatthy
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 203 guests |
© 2017 Synapse Audio Software. All Rights Reserved. |