That's exactly what I was thinking.
UnderwaterRainbow wrote:Because Rich values his customers time and input. . .
Yeah, ALL his customers, not just the one person in 12 or 13 years who has described a need for a very specific feature that no-one will get much use from. Unless you think his time would be better spent on this than improving automation?
for the sake of simplicity
you probably wouldnt need it unless the tracks you create have alot of melodies, try hundreds or thousands of notes within 100s of different generator patterns spanning multiple synths..
What makes melodies so special? I generally find them much easier to create than good, usable rhythms and they are definitely much easier to recreate. I chuck stuff out all the time, knowing that I can do it again at some later time if I need to.
UnderwaterRainbow wrote:Whats the alternative?
Throw them away. If you created them once and they are any good, you'll have no trouble doing it again. The thought that every little idea you've ever had is worth keeping is ridiculous. I probably throw out 90% or more of the things I start work on and of the things I keep, probably only 10% of that ever gets turned into a song. The rest sit in a folder for a few years until I eventually clean 'em out.
Fl studio I could drag into channel, load into playlist, then slice away to hearts content, copy+ paste to new channel.. Nevertheless what I ask is a stretch. I liked the idea of opening a sfs file in program then export all midi via seconds opposed to...
But, as Tek said, whatever you do with them, it is still going to be a massive job and then you will still have a huge amount of MIDI files instead of a huge number of SFS files. What's the difference? You can either merge the piece you need from an SFS or import a MIDI file? Where is the advantage in one over the other?